Identifying rice field weeds from unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing imagery using deep learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rice field weed object detection can provide key information on weed species and locations for precise spraying, which is of great significance in actual agricultural production. However, facing the complex and changing real farm environments, traditional object detection methods still have difficulties in identifying small-sized, occluded and densely distributed weed instances. To address these problems, this paper proposes a multi-scale feature enhanced DETR network, named RMS-DETR. By adding multi-scale feature extraction branches on top of DETR, this model fully utilizes the information from different semantic feature layers to improve recognition capability for rice field weeds in real-world scenarios. METHODS: Introducing multi-scale feature layers on the basis of the DETR model, we conduct a differentiated design for different semantic feature layers. The high-level semantic feature layer adopts Transformer structure to extract contextual information between barnyard grass and rice plants. The low-level semantic feature layer uses CNN structure to extract local detail features of barnyard grass. Introducing multi-scale feature layers inevitably leads to increased model computation, thus lowering model inference speed. Therefore, we employ a new type of Pconv (Partial convolution) to replace traditional standard convolutions in the model. RESULTS: Compared to the original DETR model, our proposed RMS-DETR model achieved an average recognition accuracy improvement of 3.6% and 4.4% on our constructed rice field weeds dataset and the DOTA public dataset, respectively. The average recognition accuracies reached 0.792 and 0.851, respectively. The RMS-DETR model size is 40.8 M with inference time of 0.0081 s. Compared with three classical DETR models (Deformable DETR, Anchor DETR and DAB-DETR), the RMS-DETR model respectively improved average precision by 2.1%, 4.9% and 2.4%. DISCUSSION: This model is capable of accurately identifying rice field weeds in complex real-world scenarios, thus providing key technical support for precision spraying and management of variable-rate spraying systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".