MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400686001 · doi:10.1186/s13007-024-01232-0

Identifying rice field weeds from unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing imagery using deep learning

2024· article· en· W4400686001 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Methods · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerial imageryRemote sensingField (mathematics)Deep learningEnvironmental scienceSatellite imageryAerial surveyAerial rootGeographyArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceBiologyEcologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Rice field weed object detection can provide key information on weed species and locations for precise spraying, which is of great significance in actual agricultural production. However, facing the complex and changing real farm environments, traditional object detection methods still have difficulties in identifying small-sized, occluded and densely distributed weed instances. To address these problems, this paper proposes a multi-scale feature enhanced DETR network, named RMS-DETR. By adding multi-scale feature extraction branches on top of DETR, this model fully utilizes the information from different semantic feature layers to improve recognition capability for rice field weeds in real-world scenarios. METHODS: Introducing multi-scale feature layers on the basis of the DETR model, we conduct a differentiated design for different semantic feature layers. The high-level semantic feature layer adopts Transformer structure to extract contextual information between barnyard grass and rice plants. The low-level semantic feature layer uses CNN structure to extract local detail features of barnyard grass. Introducing multi-scale feature layers inevitably leads to increased model computation, thus lowering model inference speed. Therefore, we employ a new type of Pconv (Partial convolution) to replace traditional standard convolutions in the model. RESULTS: Compared to the original DETR model, our proposed RMS-DETR model achieved an average recognition accuracy improvement of 3.6% and 4.4% on our constructed rice field weeds dataset and the DOTA public dataset, respectively. The average recognition accuracies reached 0.792 and 0.851, respectively. The RMS-DETR model size is 40.8 M with inference time of 0.0081 s. Compared with three classical DETR models (Deformable DETR, Anchor DETR and DAB-DETR), the RMS-DETR model respectively improved average precision by 2.1%, 4.9% and 2.4%. DISCUSSION: This model is capable of accurately identifying rice field weeds in complex real-world scenarios, thus providing key technical support for precision spraying and management of variable-rate spraying systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it