MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400692785 · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202455001034

The numerical study of the reinforcement layer orientation effect on the behaviour of laminated plates

2024· article· en· W4400692785 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michala Weisova, Kamila Kotrasová, Vincent Kvočák

Bibliographic record

VenueE3S Web of Conferences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComposite numberFinite element methodMaterials scienceComposite materialOrientation (vector space)ReinforcementComposite plateSquare (algebra)Structural engineeringLayer (electronics)Section (typography)Core (optical fiber)Quarter (Canadian coin)GeometryMathematicsEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The analysis of the simply supported square laminated plate was conducted employing two distinct Finite Element Method (FEM) models: one representing a quarter-section of a layered laminated composite plate, and the other representing the entire layered laminated composite plate. It was found that the plate's behavior and displacements are significantly influenced by the orientation of the fibers. Moreover, the quarter-section model of the layered laminated composite plate demonstrated limitations in its universal applicability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE3S Web of ConferencesSame topicMechanical Behavior of CompositesFrench-language works237,207