MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Retrospective, Multicenter, Observational Real World Post Market Clinical Follow Up Study to Evaluate Acute Safety and Device Procedural Success of ADVAMRYL (Poliglecaprone 25) Surgical Suture. (ADVAMRYL PMCF Study)

2024· article· en· W4400695690 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal For Multidisciplinary Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical Sutures and Adhesives
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPrincess Margaret Cancer Foundation
KeywordsObservational studyMedicineRetrospective cohort studyMulticenter studyFibrous jointSurgeryInternal medicineRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this real-world experience Post-Marketing Clinical Follow-up study conducted in accordance with EU MDR 2017/745 in 70 subjects from >60 surgical centers across various surgical specialties, ADVAMRYL (Poliglecaprone 25) monofilament, synthetic absorbable sterile surgical sutures demonstrated excellent suture, needle, and overall performance. No wound complications or adverse events were reported in this study during the follow-up period of 3 months, and there were no reports of prolonged or repeat hospitalization. ADVAMRYL (Poliglecaprone 25) sutures are a safe and effective option for a very wide variety of surgical procedures in a diverse population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.528
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it