Penyuluhan Dan Pelatihan Pengolahan Rimpang Menjadi Jamu Instan Di Kelompok Wanita Tani Karya Agung
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tanaman obat merupakan tanaman dengan memiliki khasiat yang dapat digunakan sebagai obat-obatan dalam pencegahan dan penyembuhan penyakit. Pasca Covid-19, masyarakat tetap mengkonsumsi obat-obat tradisional untuk menjaga kesehatan. Hal ini yang dimanfaatkan oleh KWT Karya Agung untuk tetap memproduksi jamu instan, dimana permintaan jamu instan yang terus meningkat. KWT Karya Agung memiliki kendala terkait dengan pembuatan produksi yang lebih baik dan peralatan yang digunakan masih sangat sederhana, oleh karena itu perlu pemberdayaan KWT Karya Agung supaya lebih maju lagi terutama dalam memproduksi jamu instan. Anggota KWT Karya Agung berjumlah 25 orang yang bertempat di jalan 9 dusun V RT/RW 005/002 Kampung Terbanggi Besar Kecamatan Terbanggi Besar Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. Pengabdian yang dilakukan menjadi 3 tahap yaitu Focus Group Discousion (FGD), Penyuluhan dan Pelatihan
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.047 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".