Exploring Differences between Two Decades of Mental Health Related Emergency Department Visits by Youth via Recurrent Events Analyses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We aim to develop a tool for understanding how the mental health of youth aged less than 18 years evolve over time through administrative records of mental health related emergency department (MHED) visits in two decades. Administrative health data usually contain rich information for investigating public health issues; however, many restrictions and regulations apply to their use. Moreover, the data are usually not in a conventional format since administrative databases are created and maintained to serve non-research purposes and only information for people who seek health services is accessible. Analysis of administrative health data is thus challenging in general. In the MHED data analyses, we are particularly concerned with (i) evaluating dynamic patterns and impacts with doubly-censored recurrent event data, and (ii) re-calibrating estimators developed based on truncated data by leveraging summary statistics from the population. The findings are verified empirically via simulation. We have established the asymptotic properties of the inference procedures. The contributions of this paper are twofold. We present innovative strategies for processing doubly-censored recurrent event data, and overcoming the truncation induced by the data collection. In addition, through exploring the pediatric MHED visit records, we provide new insights into children/youths mental health changes over time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".