MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400724255 · doi:10.32370/ia_2024_02_3

Relation Between the Single Orths of a Point on the Axis of the Deformed Thread in the Case of Euler and Lagrange Coordinates

2024· article· en· W4400724255 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Volodymyr SHCHERBAN, ОКСАНА КОЛИСКО, Gennadiy Melnyk, Marijna Goldberg, Anton KIRICHENKO, Valerij Kalashnyk

Bibliographic record

VenueIntellectual Archive · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTextile materials and evaluations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThread (computing)TangentMathematicsCoordinate systemUnit vectorGeometryPosition (finance)Mathematical analysisEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The values of the position vectors and unit tangents have been determined by research, defining the positions of points on the axis of the deformed thread using Eulerian and Lagrangian coordinates. The position vector defines the point's position on the line relative to the moving coordinate system. It determines the point's position on the line relative to the stationary coordinate system. Consequently, when the thread is displaced, the point moves to a new position. The new position vector defines the point's position on the line. The displacement vector of the point on the thread axis characterizes the shift of points due to deformation at the thread intersection. This has made it possible to use these theoretical relation at the initial stage of designing the technological process to derive equations for determining thread tension in the fabric and knit forming zone, reduce thread breakage rates, and enhance the quality of the finished products

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntellectual ArchiveSame topicTextile materials and evaluationsFrench-language works237,207