MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400725171 · doi:10.22215/cujs.v2i1.4515

Neuroscientist Spotlight: Dr. Nicole Avena's Pioneering Research and Advocacy on Food Addiction

2024· article· en· W4400725171 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Rosa Salles Vieira

Bibliographic record

VenueCarleton undergraduate journal of science. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroscientistAvenaEnvironmental ethicsArtArt historyPsychoanalysisPsychologyPhilosophyBiologyNeuroscienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dr. Avena has achieved excellence in multiple fields as a Professor of health psychology at Princeton University, a Neuroscientist Researcher, a public speaker, and an author. Her ground-breaking research on food addiction has opened new doors to the world of healthy eating and mental health! She was one of the first neuroscientists to explore the idea that food could be addictive and shed light on the dangers of excessive sugar. Dr. Avena shares her research findings publicly through talk shows and books on childhood and pregnancy nutrition to advocate the dangers of excessive sugar and the reality of food addiction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCarleton undergraduate journal of science.Same topicNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive FunctionFrench-language works237,207