MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400726749 · doi:10.26685/urncst.654

MISA Case Competition 2024

2024· article· en· W4400726749 on OpenAlexaff
Jackie Ve, Deepshikha Deepshikha, Hiba Attar, Srishti Khadilkar

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTechnology Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetition (biology)BusinessBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The MISA Case Competition is an undergraduate research conference organized by the Microbiology and Immunology Student Association (MISA) at Western University to promote innovation, collaboration, and scientific inquiry amongst students interested in microbiology and immunology. In 2023, MISA successfully ran our first case competition. This year, the theme for the MISA Case Competition 2024 was for our undergraduate teams to devise novel strategies and treatments to combat or prevent autoimmune disorders. Their approach could target any aspect of autoimmune diseases, whether it be through novel preventative initiatives, diagnostic techniques, or treatment strategies. Our conference includes oral presentations from the top six teams and a panel of judges composed of faculty members from the Department of Microbiology and Immunology and the Department of Biochemistry at Western University, with awards for the top three teams. Through the MISA Case Competition, we hope to provide an opportunity for students to conceive new ideas to advance the understanding and management of autoimmune diseases, improving patient outcomes and reducing the societal burden of these conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0130.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3040.125

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) JournalSame topicTechnology Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207