Optimizing Internet Traffic Predictions with a Novel Deep Learning EMD-KNN Framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Internet traffic volume estimation has a significant impact on the business policies of the ISP (Internet Service Provider) industry and business successions. Forecasting the internet traffic demand helps to shed light on the future traffic trend, which is often helpful for ISPs’ decision-making in network planning activities and investments. Besides, the capability to understand future trend contributes to managing regular and long-term operations. This study aims to predict the network traffic volume demand using deep sequence methods that incorporate Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) based noise reduction, Empirical rule based outlier detection, and K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN) based outlier mitigation. In contrast to the former studies, the proposed model does not rely on a particular EMD decomposed component called Intrinsic Mode Function (IMF) for signal denoising. In our proposed traffic prediction model, we used an average of all IMFs components for signal denoising. Moreover, the abnormal data points are replaced by K nearest data point’s average, and the value for K has been optimized based on the KNN regressor prediction error measured in Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). Finally, we selected the best time-lagged feature subset for our prediction model based on AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) value. Our experiments are conducted on real-world internet traffic datasets from industry, and the proposed method is compared with various statistical and traditional deep sequence baseline models. Our results show that the proposed EMD-KNN integrated prediction models outperform comparative models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".