MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dependency-Aware Task Offloading in Cooperative UAV-HAPS-Assisted Vehicular Networks

2024· article· en· W4400728595 on OpenAlexaff
Insaf Rzig, Wael Jaafar, Maha Jebalia, Sami Tabbane

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDependency (UML)Computer networkTask (project management)Vehicular ad hoc networkComputer securityWireless ad hoc networkWirelessTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advent of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) stimulated the deployment of connected and autonomous vehicles supporting computation-intensive and delay-sensitive applications. This evolution has underscored the challenges of user device’s limited resources in vehicular networks. Addressing them requires innovative schemes, particularly in the context of integrated Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and High-Altitude Platform Stations (HAPS) networks. In this paper, we propose a novel UAV/HAPS-enabled vehicular framework aiming to enhance task management. It is predicated on a collaborative offloading scheme that caters to the Quality-of-Service requirements of multi-vehicular tasks and aims to minimize the overall energy consumption within the dynamic ITS environment. Moreover, the proposed scheme is designed to handle the decomposition of tasks into interdependent sub-tasks. Given the NP-hardness of the offloading problem, we develop an approach based on the Genetic Algorithm. Through simulations, we demonstrate the superiority of our method compared to benchmarks, in terms of successful service rate and energy consumption. Our method constitutes a substantial advancement in handling ITS services through a cooperative UAV-HAPS framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207