MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400729190 · doi:10.3390/en17143502

Transformer-Based Deep Learning Models for State of Charge and State of Health Estimation of Li-Ion Batteries: A Survey Study

2024· article· en· W4400729190 on OpenAlexaff
John Guirguis, Ryan Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState of chargeTransformerState of healthIonState (computer science)Charge (physics)Electrical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceReliability engineeringChemistryPhysicsVoltageBattery (electricity)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global transportation system’s need for electrification is driving research efforts to overcome the drawbacks of battery electric vehicles (BEVs). The accurate and reliable estimation of the states of charge (SOC) and health (SOH) of Li-Ion batteries (LIBs) is crucial for the widespread adoption of BEVs. Transformers, cutting-edge deep learning (DL) models, are demonstrating promising capabilities in addressing various sequence-processing problems. This manuscript presents a thorough survey study of previous research papers that introduced modifications in the development of Transformer-based architectures for the SOC and SOH estimation of LIBs. This study also highlights approximately 15 different real-world datasets that have been utilized for training and testing these models. A comparison is made between the architectures, addressing each state using the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) metrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergiesSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207