Targeted proteomics of plasma extracellular vesicles uncovers MUC1 as combinatorial biomarker for the early detection of high-grade serous ovarian cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The five-year prognosis for patients with late-stage high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) remains dismal, underscoring the critical need for identifying early-stage biomarkers. This study explores the potential of extracellular vesicles (EVs) circulating in blood, which are believed to harbor proteomic cargo reflective of the HGSC microenvironment, as a source for biomarker discovery. RESULTS: We conducted a comprehensive proteomic profiling of EVs isolated from blood plasma, ascites, and cell lines of patients, employing both data-dependent (DDA) and data-independent acquisition (DIA) methods to construct a spectral library tailored for targeted proteomics. Our investigation aimed at uncovering novel biomarkers for the early detection of HGSC by comparing the proteomic signatures of EVs from women with HGSC to those with benign gynecological conditions. The initial cohort, comprising 19 donors, utilized DDA proteomics for spectral library development. The subsequent cohort, involving 30 HGSC patients and 30 control subjects, employed DIA proteomics for a similar purpose. Support vector machine (SVM) classification was applied in both cohorts to identify combinatorial biomarkers with high specificity and sensitivity (ROC-AUC > 0.90). Notably, MUC1 emerged as a significant biomarker in both cohorts when used in combination with additional biomarkers. Validation through an ELISA assay on a subset of benign (n = 18), Stage I (n = 9), and stage II (n = 9) plasma samples corroborated the diagnostic utility of MUC1 in the early-stage detection of HGSC. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the value of EV-based proteomic analysis in the discovery of combinatorial biomarkers for early ovarian cancer detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".