MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400738267 · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqae084

<b> s </b>CIRCLE—An interactive visual exploration tool for single cell RNA-Seq data

2024· article· en· W4400738267 on OpenAlexafffund
Maximilian Seeger, Erich Schöls, Lars Barquist

Bibliographic record

VenueNAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBayerisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst
KeywordsMetadataVisualizationComputer scienceData visualizationFocus (optics)RNA-SeqSoftwareInteractive visualizationDimensionality reductionData miningGeneArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide WebTranscriptomeGene expressionBiologyProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

xploration) is a tool for exploratory analysis of single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data sets, with a focus on bacterial scRNA-seq. The software takes an information design perspective to re-envision visually and interactively exploring low dimensional representations of scRNA-Seq data. Users can project cells in various 3D and 2D spaces and interactively query and paint cells using rich metadata sets reporting on cell cluster, gene function, and gene expression. As a standalone application it contains, among other features, options for dimensionality reduction, navigation and interaction with data in 3d and 2d space, gene filtering, fold change and metacell computation as well as various capabilities for visualization, data import and export.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1390.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNAR Genomics and BioinformaticsSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207