MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400740017 · doi:10.1021/jacs.4c08072

Correction to “Enantioselective Imine Reduction Catalyzed by Phosphenium Ions”

2024· erratum· en· W4400740017 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Travis Lundrigan, Erin N. Welsh, Toren Hynes, Chieh‐Hung Tien, Matt R. Adams, Kayelani R. Roy, Katherine N. Robertson, Alexander W. H. Speed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaResearch Nova ScotiaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsChemistryEnantioselective synthesisImineReduction (mathematics)CatalysisIonCombinatorial chemistryMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ARTICLES ASAPPREVAddition/CorrectionNEXTORIGINAL ARTICLEThis notice is a correctionCorrection to "Enantioselective Imine Reduction Catalyzed by Phosphenium Ions"Travis LundriganTravis LundriganMore by Travis Lundrigan, Erin N. WelshErin N. WelshMore by Erin N. Welsh, Toren HynesToren HynesMore by Toren Hynes, Chieh-Hung TienChieh-Hung TienMore by Chieh-Hung Tien, Matt R. AdamsMatt R. AdamsMore by Matt R. Adams, Kayelani R. RoyKayelani R. RoyMore by Kayelani R. Roy, Katherine N. RobertsonKatherine N. RobertsonMore by Katherine N. Robertsonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5602-8059, and Alexander W. H. Speed*Alexander W. H. SpeedMore by Alexander W. H. Speedhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8997-3807Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, XXXX, XXX, XXX-XXXPublication Date (Web):July 17, 2024Publication History Received14 June 2024Published online17 July 2024https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.4c08072https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c08072correctionACS Publications© 2024 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views-Altmetric-Citations-LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookXWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (681 KB) Get e-AlertscloseSupporting Info (1)»Supporting Information Supporting Information Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1600.095

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207