The Calmodulin-like proteins, CML13 and CML14 Function as Myosin Light Chains for the Class XI Myosins in <i>Arabidopsis</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Myosins are a crucial motor protein associated with the actin cytoskeleton in eukaryotic cells. Structurally, myosins form heteromeric complexes, with smaller light chains such as calmodulin (CaM) bound to isoleucine–glutamine (IQ) domains in the neck region. These interactions facilitate mechano-enzymatic activity. Recently, we identified Arabidopsis CaM-like (CML) proteins CML13 and CML14 as interactors with proteins containing multiple IQ domains, that function as the myosin VIII light chains. This study demonstrates that CaM, CML13, and CML14 specifically bind to the neck region of all 13 Arabidopsis myosin XI isoforms, with some preference among the CaM/CML-IQ domains. Additionally, we observed distinct residue preferences within the IQ domains for CML13, CML14, and CaM. In vitro experiments revealed that recombinant CaM, CML13, and CML14 exhibit calcium-independent binding to the IQ domains of myosin XIs. Furthermore, when co-expressed with MAP65-1–myosin fusion proteins containing the IQ domains of myosin XIs, CaM, CML13, and CML14 co-localize to microtubules. In vitro actin motility assays demonstrated that recombinant CML13, CML14, and CaM function as myosin XI light chains. A cml13 T-DNA mutant exhibited a shortened primary root phenotype that was complemented by the wild-type CML13 and was similar to that observed in a triple myosin XI mutant ( xi3KO ). Overall, our data indicate that Arabidopsis CML13 and CML14 are novel myosin XI light chains that likely participate in a breadth of myosin XI functions. Highlight Myosin XI proteins play a crucial role in the plant cytoskeleton, but their associated light chains have remained unidentified. Here, we show that calmodulin-like proteins, CML13 and CML14, serve as light chains for myosin XI, similar to their role for myosin VIII proteins
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".