MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400759803 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggae247

Full-waveform inversion of cross-hole radio frequency electromagnetic data

2024· article· en· W4400759803 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Polina Zheglova, Colin G. Farquharson, Alison Malcolm

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsGeologyInversion (geology)WaveformInverse theoryGeophysicsGeodesySeismologyAcousticsPhysicsComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY We consider application of full-waveform inversion (FWI) to radio-frequency electromagnetic (EM) data. Radio-frequency imaging (RIM) is a cross-borehole technique to image EM subsurface properties from measurements of transmitted radio-frequency waves. It is used in coal seam imaging, ore exploration and various engineering and civil engineering applications. RIM operates at frequencies from 50 kHz to several tens of MHz. It differs from other geophysical EM methods, because the frequency band includes the transition between the wave propagation and diffusion regimes. RIM data are acquired in 2-D cross-hole sections in a reciprocal manner. Traditionally, radio-frequency data are inverted by straight-ray tomography because it is inexpensive and easy to implement. It is argued that due to attenuation, the sensitivity of the transmitted electric field is the strongest within the first Fresnel zone of the ray connecting the transmitter and receiver. While straight-ray tomography is a simple method to implement and fast, the nonlinearity in the relationship between model parameters and data is often strong enough to warrant nonlinear inversion techniques. FWI is an iterative high-resolution technique, in which the physical properties are updated to minimize the misfit between the measured and modelled wavefields. Full-waveform techniques have been used and extensively studied for the inversion of seismic data, and more recently, they have been applied to the inversion of ground penetrating radar data. Nonlinear inversion methods for RIM data are less advanced. Their use has been hindered by the high cost of full-wave modelling and the high conductivity contrasts of many RIM targets, and, to some extent, by the limitations of the measuring instruments. We present the first application of this methodology to perform simultaneous conductivity and permittivity inversion of RIM data. We implement the inversion in the frequency domain in two dimensions using Limited-memory Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (L-BFGS) optimization. We analyse the sensitivity of the data to the model parameters and the parameter trade-off and validate the proposed methodology on a synthetic example with moderate conductivity variations and localized highly conductive targets. We then apply the FWI methodology to a field data set from Sudbury, Canada. For the field data set, we determine the most appropriate pre-processing steps that take into account specific peculiarities of RIM: the insufficient prior information about the subsurface and the limitations of the measuring equipment. We show that FWI is applicable under the conditions of RIM and is robust to imperfect prior knowledge: we obtain satisfactory model recoveries starting from homogeneous initial models in all of our examples. Just as other methods, FWI underestimates large conductivity contrasts due to the loss of sensitivity of the transmitted electric field to the conductivity variations as the conductivity increases above a certain level. The permittivity inside high conductors cannot be recovered, however, recovering permittivity variations in the resistive zones helps obtain better focused conductivity images with fewer artefacts. Overall, FWI produces cleaner, less noisy and higher resolution reconstructions than the methods currently used in practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207