Sex differences in clinical presentation in youth at high risk for psychosis who transition to psychosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sex differences have been observed in individuals with schizophrenia and for those at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. However, specific differences in CHR individuals who transition to psychosis remain inconsistent and understudied. This study aimed to investigate sex differences in 156 CHR individuals who made the transition to psychosis. A wide range of demographics, positive and negative symptoms, depression, anxiety, social and role functioning, trauma, and substance use were assessed at baseline and symptoms and diagnoses at the time of transition. Fluctuations in positive and negative symptoms and different medications were also assessed. No sex differences were observed at baseline for those who later transitioned to psychosis. At transition, males were significantly more likely to be diagnosed as having schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder and through the course of the study, males were more likely to be taking stimulants. Limitations in this study was the lack of longitudinal follow-up post transition. The study highlights the need for further research on sex differences in individuals who transition to psychosis. Understanding these differences can have implications for treatment and monitoring of CHR individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".