MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400773640 · doi:10.35339/msz.2024.93.1.nes

Organizational and legal measures to prepare the system of palliative and hospice care of Ukraine for the widespread use of medical cannabis

2024· article· en· W4400773640 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V.G. Nesterenko

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine Today and Tomorrow · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCannabisMedical cannabisPalliative careBusinessMedicineNursingPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Ukraine, the procedure for the legalization of medical cannabis, which is needed for approximately 6 million patients with cancer in the palliative stages, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, lateral amniotic sclerosis, fibromyalgia, arthritis, HIV/AIDS, glaucoma, post-traumatic stress disorder, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's disease, Tourette, Lennox-Gastaut, Dravet syndromes, irritable bowel, back pain, chronic pain due to spinal cord injuries, diabetic neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, is being completed. Cannabis is necessary for such patients to overcome spasticity, chronic pain, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, increased eye pressure. It can be a supplement to treatment with other pharmaceuticals or an alternative to them. On the eve of the entry into force of the relevant law, it is necessary to determine the main directions for the rapid development of the necessary by-laws (clinical protocols, instructions, etc.) for the rapid start of the wide use of cannabis in clinical practice, in particular in palliative medicine. Using the methods of systematic analysis and bibliosemantic, a study of scientific literary sources in Google Scholar and PubMed was conducted to study the main properties of medical cannabis, the medical and social risks of its use, in particular side effects, the increase in illegal recreational use of herbal cannabis. The experience of other countries where medical cannabis has already been legalized (USA, Canada, Australia, Denmark, Germany, Israel, Switzerland) has been studied. The list of normative legal acts of Ukraine that can regulate the use of medical cannabis has been defined: 27 evidence-based clinical guidelines; 27 standards and protocols of medical care. Possible scenarios are identified and the necessary measures are proposed for the adoption of legal acts for the final decriminalization of cannabis, the determination and forecasting of the need for palliative patients, the creation of conditions for the cultivation of Ukrainian herbal cannabis and the manufacture of domestic pharmaceuticals, reimbursement of their cost to patients. Keywords: chronic pain, narcotic painkillers, marijuana, PTSD, anorexia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine Today and TomorrowSame topicCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchFrench-language works237,207