MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A pneumonia detection system based on MobileNetv2 network and model callback

2024· article· en· W4400780667 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fengwei Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied and Computational Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCallbackPneumoniaComputer scienceMedicineComputer networkInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study focuses on automatically classifying radiographic images of the chest region into standard classification, COVID-19 classification, and viral pneumonia classification by utilizing complex neural networks. Using a chest radiograph dataset from the academic bastion Université de Montréal, the study introduces an innovative paradigm rooted in MobileNetV2. We conducted a comparative analysis to evaluate the efficacy of this avant-garde model by juxtaposing it with the typical DenseNet121 and RESNET50 popular in the field of medical image classification. This exploration revealed MobileNetV2 as an ingenious model distinguished by its tiny scale and commendable accuracy. Using DW convolution design greatly reduces the computational complexity and parameter count. Regarding the composition of the architecture, transfer learning is used to attach global mean pooling and fully connected layers on top of MobileNetV2, and is customized for nuanced tripartite classification work. Comparative evaluation shows that the MobileNetV2 model has only 2,643,187 parameters, completes training in just 37 seconds, and has an accuracy of 98.48%. In contrast, although DenseNet121 and RESNET50 demonstrate commendable proficiency, their large model dimensions and lengthy training intervals limit their usefulness in resource-limited environments. The findings highlight the superior performance of the MobileNetV2 model in the field of chest X-ray classification, providing a simplified and efficient alternative for deployment on mobile and embedded devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied and Computational EngineeringSame topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207