MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4400791199 · doi:10.1515/9782763702308

Wilfrid Laurier

2007· book· en· W4400791199 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
RÉal BÉlanger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Sciences Research and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quand la politique devient passion… Formule qui résume admirablement la vie privée et publique de celui qui demeure sans doute l’homme politique canadien le plus illustre : Wilfrid Laurier. Illustre et mal connu tout à la fois. Voilà ­pourquoi Réal Bélanger, professeur au Département d’histoire de l’Université Laval et codirecteur du Dictionnaire biographique du Canada/Dictionary of ­Canadian Biography, a voulu, dans cette biographie historique, tracer, sans parti pris ni indulgence, le portrait du premier ministre et du chef de parti, mais aussi de l’homme. En effet, derrière le personnage, le lecteur découvrira un homme fascinant et attachant. Cette biographie fut le produit de quelque douze années de recherche dans de multiples fonds d’archives, journaux d’époque, mémoires, comptes rendus des ­débats de la Chambre des communes et autres sources des plus diversifiées. Lancée en 1986, au moment de la parution de la série télévisée Wilfrid ­Laurier produite par la Société Radio-Canada, elle s’est méritée le prix Maxime-Raymond et fut considérée, en 2002, comme l’une des vingt-cinq biographies marquantes des vingt-cinq dernières années du Salon du livre de Montréal. Aujourd’hui, Réal Bélanger présente aux lecteurs une édition mise à jour de cette biographie qui tient compte de l’historiographie des vingt dernières années.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2480.115

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.210
GPT teacher head0.547
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealth Sciences Research and Education→French-language works237,207→