Influence of Plateau Environment on Operating Speed at Exit Ramps
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the effects of low-pressure and hypoxic environments at high altitudes, drivers in high-altitude areas exhibit increased perceived reaction times, leading to challenges in accurate speed estimation and handling judgment. This study aims to quantitatively analyze the impact of plateau environments on operating speeds at interchange exit ramps. Utilizing a UC/win-road simulator, six scenarios of expressway exit ramps were constructed. The simulation experiments involved 50 participants (35 males, 15 females) from Nanjing, China (altitude of 50 m) and 50 participants (36 males, 14 females) from Lhasa, China (altitude of 3,650 m). This research focused on examining the influence of the plateau environment on drivers’ operating speeds, investigating variations in speed between drivers in plain and plateau areas, across genders, and during different acclimation periods. It also aimed to predict operating speeds at the midpoint and exit of the curve on the exit ramp for drivers in both plain and plateau areas. Based on these predictions, the study elucidated the trend of operating speed as influenced by the low-pressure and hypoxic conditions of the plateau, as well as the characteristics of the exit ramp’s horizontal curve. Additionally, the research uncovered the internal correlations and potential reasons linking operating speed to drivers’ perception and response abilities, physiological and visual load levels, and driving styles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".