MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400798534 · doi:10.1016/j.bas.2024.102903

The death of a neurotrauma trial lessons learned from the prematurely halted randomized evaluation of surgery in elderly with traumatic acute subdural hematoma (RESET-ASDH) trial

2024· article· en· W4400798534 on OpenAlexaff
Ranjit D. Singh, Jeroen T.J.M. van Dijck, Thomas A. van Essen, Hayden P. Nix, Rick Vreeburg, Hugo F. den Boogert, Godard C. W. de Ruiter, Bart Depreitere, Wilco C. Peul

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain and Spine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreDalhousie University
FundersLeids Universitair Medisch CentrumZonMw
KeywordsReset (finance)MedicineRandomized controlled trialAcute subdural hematomaTraumatic brain injuryHematomaSurgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) due to traumatic brain injury (TBI) constitutes an increasing global health problem, especially in the elderly population. Treatment decisions on surgical versus conservative management pose a neurosurgical dilemma. Large practice variation exists between countries, hospitals, and individual neurosurgeons, illustrating the presence of 'clinical equipoise'. The RESET-ASDH trial aimed to address this dilemma but was terminated prematurely due to insufficient patient recruitment. Research question: What factors may have contributed to the premature discontinuation of the RESET-ASDH trial? Materials and methods: The RESET-ASDH was a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing functional outcome at 1 year after early surgery or an initial conservative treatment in elderly patients (≥65 years) with a traumatic ASDH. Logs of registry data, medical-ethical approval timelines and COVID-19 related research documents were analyzed. Furthermore, non-structured interviews with involved clinical research personnel were conducted. Results: The concept of clinical equipoise was broadly misinterpreted by neurosurgeons as individual uncertainty, hampering patient recruitment. Also, the elderly target population complicated the inclusion process as elderly and their informal caregivers were hesitant to participate in our acute surgical trial. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic added additional hurdles like delayed medical-ethical approval, a decline in eligible patients and repeated trial halts during the peaks of the pandemic. Discussion and conclusion: The premature termination of the RESET-ASDH study may have been related to the trial's methodology and target population with an additional impact of COVID-19. Future acute neurosurgical trials in elderly may consider these challenges to prevent premature trial termination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.098
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.175
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0980.175
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain and SpineSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesFrench-language works237,207