MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400799256 · doi:10.1145/3641521.3664413

Reframe: Recording and Editing Character Motion in Virtual Reality

2024· article· en· W4400799256 on OpenAlexaff
Qian Zhou, Aniruddha Prithul, Hans Kellner, Brian Pene, David Ledo, Sebastian Herrera Urrutia, Hilmar Koch, George Fitzmaurice, Fraser Anderson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman Motion and Animation
Canadian institutionsAutodesk (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive reframingCharacter (mathematics)Computer scienceVirtual realityComputer graphics (images)Motion (physics)Character animationHuman–computer interactionMotion captureArtificial intelligenceAnimationComputer animationPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Creating lifelike 3D character animations is traditionally complex and requires substantial skill and effort. To overcome this challenge, we introduce Reframe, a Virtual Reality animation authoring interface that allows users to record and edit motion. Reframe utilizes tracking technology in Virtual Reality headsets to capture the user’s full-body motion, facial expressions, and hand gestures. To facilitate the editing process, we have developed an immersive motion editing interface that combines spatial and temporal control for character animation. This system extracts keyposes from the 3D character animation and displays them along a timeline, connecting the joints through 3D trajectories to depict the character’s movement. We have created a proof-of-concept prototype that demonstrates how a single user can select and animate multiple characters in a scene. This system offers an interactive experience that explores the possibilities of future immersive animation technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Motion and AnimationFrench-language works237,207