CANUDRUGS: canudo biodegradável à base de resíduos industriais de Saccharum officinarum como identificador de famácos em bebidas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Apesar de não ser um método criminal recente, a adulteração de bebidas com fármacos possui dificuldades em ser identificada e prevenida. As benzodiazepinas são as drogas mais utilizadas nesses delitos. Diminuem a atividade do sistema nervoso central, além disso, quando combinadas com álcool ou administradas em doses elevadas, causa inconsciência às vítimas. Por isso, o objetivo do projeto foi reduzir os crimes associados às drogas facilitadoras a partir da produção de um canudo capaz de identificar colorimetricamente Alprazolam, Clonazepam e Diazepam. Como resultado da adição desses medicamentos, o nível de cloro das bebidas é alterado. Portanto, com o reagente adequado foi possível identificar instantaneamente, através de um canudo construído do bagaço da cana de açúcar, benzodiazepinas. O resultado mostrou um canudo que não degrada o meio ambiente, auxilia na prevenção de crimes com drogas facilitadoras, promovendo maior segurança pública.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".