MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4400807679 · doi:10.1101/2024.07.19.24310687

Cerebrospinal Fluid and Plasma Metabolites with Parkinson’s Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study

2024· preprint· en· W4400807679 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. W. Wang, Ran Zheng, Yi Fang, Jin Cao, Baorong Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMendelian randomizationCerebrospinal fluidMedicineDiseaseRandomizationInternal medicineClinical trialBiologyGeneticsGeneGenetic variants

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background and Objective Previous studies have identified associations between metabolites and Parkinson’s disease (PD), but the causal relationships remain unclear. This study aims to identify causal relationships between specific cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma metabolites and the PD risk using Mendelian Randomization (MR). Methods We utilized data on 338 CSF metabolites from the Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center and the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer’s Prevention, and 1,400 plasma metabolites from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. PD outcome data were obtained from a GWAS meta-analysis by the International Parkinson’s Disease Genomics Consortium. MR analysis was conducted using the TwoSampleMR package in R. Results MR analysis identified 49 plasma metabolites with suggestive causal relationships with PD risk, including 21 positively associated metabolites, 23 negatively associated metabolites, and 5 unknown compounds. In the CSF, six metabolites showed suggestive causal relationships with PD, including positively associated dimethylglycine, gluconate, oxalate (ethanedioate), and the unknown metabolite X-12015, while (1-enyl-palmitoyl)-2-arachidonoyl-GPC (P-16:0/20:4) and the unknown metabolite X-23587 were negatively associated. Among the plasma metabolites, those with a positive association with PD risk include hydroxy-3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropanoic acid (hydroxy-CMPF), carnitine C14, 1-linoleoyl-GPG (18:2), glucose to maltose ratio, and cis-3,4-methyleneheptanoate. Conversely, metabolites with a negative association with PD risk include tryptophan, succinate to acetoacetate ratio, N,N,N-trimethyl-alanylproline betaine (TMAP), glucuronide of piperine metabolite C17H21NO3, and linoleoylcholine. Conclusion Our study underscores the correlation between CSF and plasma metabolites and PD risk, highlighting specific metabolites as potential biomarkers for diagnosis and therapeutic targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicGenomics and Rare Diseases→French-language works237,207→