MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400810760 · doi:10.1109/csci62032.2023.00186

Combined Medical Image Super-Resolution and Modality Translation Using GAN Transformer-Based Model

2023· article· en· W4400810760 on OpenAlexafffund
Melika Abdollahi, Heidar Davoudi, Mehran Ebrahimi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicImage Processing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTransformerTranslation (biology)Modality (human–computer interaction)Computer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For many practical applications in medical image analysis and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD), it is necessary to accurately capture intricate anatomical and pathological details, given imaging acquisitions in different modalities. We introduce a novel GAN (Generative Adversarial Network) transformer-based model designed for combined super-resolution and modality translation of magnetic resonance images (MRI). The model aims to improve clinical workflows by enhancing image resolution and translating between different imaging modalities, e.g., T1 and T2 MRI data, by offering more detailed visualization that could potentially aid diagnosis and treatment planning. The approach will be validated quantitatively and qualitatively on the publicly available BraTS imaging dataset to provide a 4x increase in resolution and modality translation between T1 and T2 MRI pairs to demonstrate its potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Processing Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207