A Smart Particle Filter Technology for Battery State Estimation and Life Prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries are commonly employed in a wide range of industrial and household applications. However, the performance of Li-ion batteries degrades over time due to the aging process, which is difficult to measure using general sensors. Although particle filter (PF) technique can be used for modeling the nonlinear degradation features of battery system, it suffers sample degeneracy and impoverishment problems that limit its ability to accurately capture the electrochemical behaviors of a battery system in state estimation. This paper proposes a smart particle filter (SPF) technique to address these problems and improve the performance of PFs. The proposed SPF technique includes two innovative aspects. Firstly, a sample degeneracy detection method is suggested to identify the low-weight particles associated with sample degeneracy. Secondly, a mutation approach is proposed to adaptively explore the posterior probability density function (PDF) and process the low-weight particles to tackle sample degeneracy. Simulation tests have been conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed SPF technique. It is also implemented for predicting the remaining useful life (RUL) of Li-ion batteries. The results of the tests indicate that the proposed SPF technique can effectively capture a system's dynamic behavior and track system characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".