An Enhanced Lightweight Hash-Chain-Based Multi-Node Mutual Authentication Algorithm for Large and Dense IoT Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IoT is rapidly revolutionizing the global communication network with billions of new devices deployed and connected with each other. Many of these devices collect and transfer sensitive or mission critical data, making security a top priority. Compared to traditional Internet, IoT networks often operate in open and harsh environment, and may experience frequent delays, traffic loss and attacks; Meanwhile, IoT devices are often severally constrained in computational power, storage space, network bandwidth, and power supply, which prevent them from deploying traditional security schemes. Authentication is an important security mechanism that can be used to identify unauthorized devices or users. Due to resource constraints of IoT networks, it is highly desirable for the authentication scheme to be lightweight while also being highly effective. In this paper, we developed and evaluated a hash-chain-based multi-node mutual authentication algorithm. Nodes on a network all share a common secret key and broadcast to other nodes in range. Each node may also add to the hash chain and rebroadcast, which will be used to authenticate all nodes in the network. Computer simulations were performed to validate the algorithm.11An earlier version of the work was presented in IEEE Future Networks World Forum, November 2022, Montreal Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".