Unusual sulfide-rich magmatic apatite crystals from >2.7 Ga Abitibi Greenstone Belt, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Sodic volcano-plutonic terranes in the Archean can be well preserved, but why oxidized S-rich sodic magmas and porphyry-type Cu-Au deposits are so rare remains poorly understood. Here we addressed this issue by measuring the S concentration and S6+/ΣS ratio of primary apatite grains in >2.7 Ga felsic volcanic rocks from the well-characterized Neoarchean Abitibi Greenstone Belt of the Superior Province, Canada. Whereas apatite grains in most samples contain low-S concentrations (<0.01 wt%, n = 24), a few apatite samples are S-rich (0.14 ± 0.03 wt%, 1σ) and have low-S6+/ΣS ratios (0.56 ± 0.17; 1σ, n = 4). Samples with S-poor apatite have variable whole-rock La/Yb ratios (generally <30) and zircon 10 000*(Eu/Eu*)/Yb ratios of 11 ± 8 (1σ), which may be products of plume-driven or over-thickened crustal melting. In contrast, the samples with S-rich apatite have elevated La/Yb ratios of 49 ± 15 (1σ), zircon 10 000*(Eu/EuN*)/Yb ratios of 26 ± 7 (1σ), and zircon δ18O values of 5.8 ± 0.1 ‰ (1σ), consistent with a deep, hydrous and homogeneous mantle-like source for the melts dominated by amphibole ± garnet fractionation that is reminiscent of subduction-like process. These are the first reported results documenting the predominant accommodation of relatively reduced S in S-rich apatite grains crystallized from terrestrial silicate melts, possibly reflecting slight oxidation associated with the hydration of Neoarchean mantle and crystal fractionation over the magma evolution. The more common S-poor apatite data suggest that suppressed oxidation of the parental sodic magmas led to weak S emission from Earth’s interior to its evolving surface, explaining the rarity of porphyry-type Cu deposits in >2.7 Ga Archean sodic volcano-plutonic terranes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".