Unveiling New Artistic Dimensions in Calligraphic Arabic Script with Generative Adversarial Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present an artistic exploration into calligraphic Arabic script, focusing on the nastaliq style predominant in Iran, by harnessing the affordances of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). Recognizing the unique challenges posed by Arabic script's cursive nature and its inadequate representation by conventional tools, our work seeks to bridge the gap between traditional calligraphy and novel technological capabilities. Two custom datasets are introduced, Nas4-60k and Nas4-60k-aug, designed to train our generative networks in producing calligraphic Arabic. Utilizing the StyleGAN2-ada architecture, our approach successfully generates stylistically coherent and high-quality calligraphic samples. These samples exhibit meaningful feature extraction and generalization of calligraphic features, extending beyond the training sets. Furthermore, our system reveals a continuous spectrum of calligraphic features through latent space interpolations, leading to the creation of dynamic, innovative artworks that blend traditional and contemporary elements of Arabic calligraphy. Drawing inspiration from the compositional form of siyah-mashq, our work culminates in multiple publicly presented artworks that exhibit a new mode of creative expression and highlight the potential of GANs in unveiling new artistic dimensions in calligraphic Arabic script.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".