MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400821435 · doi:10.12789/geocanj.2024.51.211

GAC-MAC-PEG 2024 Brandon Meeting: Abstracts, Volume 47

2024· article· en· W4400821435 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Paul Alexandre

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoscience Canada · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutreachBannerAppealLibrary scienceGovernment (linguistics)IndigenousDiversity (politics)PublishingPolitical scienceHistoryArchaeologyComputer scienceLawBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under the banner of At The Heart Of The Continent, GAC-MAC-PEG 2024 offered a wide and diverse scientific program, with a strong critical minerals component, and several workshops and fieldtrips, as well as extensive outreach and Indigenous engagement programs.It also featured several social events and formal functions that contributed to bringing geoscientists together.The meeting was strongly supported by industry, academia, and government sponsors and hosted numerous exhibitors.This year's meeting was smaller than some previous GAC-MAC events, with 260 abstracts (190 oral and 70 poster presentations) and 350 attendees, perhaps due to the remoteness and perceived lack of appeal of Brandon.Nevertheless, the meeting attracted many international delegates from 25 coun-tries located on almost every continent -indeed, approximately a fifth of the delegates came from beyond Canada.Our diverse attendees were able to learn about the strong and successful Geology Department at Brandon University and about Brandon, the Wheat City, the largest equestrian centre in Canada, and home to a surprisingly successful hockey team, the Wheat Kings.Readers will be able to appreciate the breadth and diversity of the scientific program at the GAC-MAC-PEG 2024 meeting by perusing this issue of Geoscience Canada, which includes all the abstracts.Please note that some limited additional editing was applied as part of the publishing process, so for some there may be small differences from versions distributed at the meeting or available at the conference website.In most cases, these are just format-related matters, but there were a few cases where minor adjustments to grammar, spelling, and continuity of text were resolved to the best of the Geoscience Canada editors' abilities.A very small number of abstracts originally included references, funding acknowledgments or other material that is normally excluded from abstracts, and these were removed from the final layout.Readers who have specific questions about a given contribution or who are interested in clarification should contact the author(s).Registered users can access all abstracts on the conference website (event.fourwaves.com/gacmac2024/,under Presentations).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.855

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeoscience CanadaSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207