Overseas R&D, domestic R&D, and parent company innovation performance in emerging market
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seeking research and development (R&D) capacity overseas is fast becoming an important leapfrogging strategy for emerging market enterprises. Combining knowledge‐based and institutional‐based views, this study develops an analytical framework for the impact of overseas and domestic R&D on the innovation performance of parent companies. Using panel data of 185 enterprises in China from 2012 to 2020, we find that overseas R&D significantly improves the innovation performance of the parent company; domestic R&D has a significant promoting effect on the innovation performance of the parent company, also playing a partial mediating role between overseas R&D and innovation performance of the parent company. Regional institutional quality positively moderates the relationship between overseas and domestic R&D. Our study contributes to a deeper understanding of the pathways and mechanisms through which overseas R&D affects emerging‐market firms' innovation performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it