MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400834356 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4f8c

Spectrum and Polarization of the Galactic Center Radio Transient ASKAP J173608.2–321635 from THOR-GC and VLITE

2024· article· en· W4400834356 on OpenAlexafffund
Kierra J. Weatherhead, J. M. Stil, M. R. Rugel, Wendy Peters, L. D. Anderson, Ashley T. Barnes, H. Beuther, T. E. Clarke, Sergio A. Dzib, P. F. Goldsmith, K. M. Menten, Kristina Nyland, Mattia C. Sormani, J. S. Urquhart

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchRussian Academy of SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationLeibniz-Institut für Astrophysik PotsdamRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität BonnLeibniz-GemeinschaftJet Propulsion LaboratoryUniversität HamburgMax-Planck-GesellschaftU.S. Naval Research LaboratoryEberhard Karls Universität TübingenEuropean CommissionCalifornia Institute of TechnologyAssociated UniversitiesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsPolarization (electrochemistry)Analytical Chemistry (journal)AstrophysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The radio transient ASKAP J173608.2–321635, at the position (ℓ, b) = (356.°0872, −0.°0390), was serendipitously observed by The H i/OH/Recombination line survey of the Galactic center at three epochs in 2020 March, 2020 April, and 2021 February. The source was detected only on 2020 April 11 with a flux density of 20.6 ± 1.1 mJy at 1.23 GHz and in-band spectral index of α = −3.1 ± 0.2. The commensal Very Large Array Low-band Ionsophere and Transient Experiment simultaneously detected the source at 339 MHz with a flux density of 122.6 ± 20.4 mJy, indicating a spectral break below 1 GHz. The rotation measure (RM) in 2020 April was 63.9 ± 0.3 rad m−2, which almost triples the range of the variable RM observed by Wang et al. to ∼130 rad m−2. The polarization angle, corrected for Faraday rotation, was 97° ± 6°. The 1.23 GHz linear polarization was 76.7% ± 3.9% with wavelength-dependent depolarization, indicating a Faraday depth dispersion of σ ϕ = 4.8 − 0.7 + 0.5 rad m − 2 . We find an upper limit to the circular polarization of ∣V∣/I < 10.1%. Interpretation of the data in terms of diffractive scattering of radio waves by a plasma near the source indicates an electron density and a line-of-sight magnetic field strength within a factor of 3 of n e ∼ 2 cm−3 and B ∥ ∼ 2 × 105 μ G. Combined with causality limits to the size of the source, these parameters are consistent with the low-frequency spectral break resulting from synchrotron self-absorption, not free–free absorption. A possible interpretation of the source is a highly supersonic neutron star interacting with a changing environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207