Sex Disparities in Mortality After Endovascular Therapy in Large Core Infarcts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background In recent large core endovascular therapy (EVT) trials of large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (AIS), treatment was associated with reduced rates of mortality. Because post‐AIS mortality can be influenced by societal and biological factors that differ between women and men, we investigate sex‐based differences in mortality outcomes following EVT in large core AIS. Methods From our prospectively collected multicenter registry across 4 comprehensive stroke centers in the Greater Houston area, we identified patients from 2017 to 2022 with large vessel occlusion AIS and large infarct core. Large infarct core was defined by computed tomography perfusion exceeding 70 mL (by regional cerebral blood flow measurements using automated postprocessing) or computed tomography Alberta Stroke Program Early CT [Computed Tomography] Score<6. The primary outcome of this study was the likelihood of mortality at 90 days, determined through multivariable logistic regression adjusted for EVT, sex, and EVT/sex interaction term. Secondary outcomes included 90‐day disability outcomes and intracerebral hemorrhage. Results Among 190 patients who met inclusion criteria, 50% were female and 45.3% received EVT. Demographic differences between the sexes were largely balanced apart from the older age of presentation for women compared with men (75 versus 67, women versus men; P <0.01). In univariable analysis, women who did not receive EVT had greater mortality (27.4% difference; P <0.001) compared with men, with comparable rates in EVT‐treated cohorts. In multivariable analysis, non‐EVT management was strongly associated with mortality in women compared with men at discharge (odds ratio [OR] 5.81, 95% CI [1.96–17.23]) and 90‐days (OR 6.77, 95% CI [2.09–21.94]). In the secondary analysis, which additionally adjusted the model for age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, these findings were unchanged. The sex/EVT interaction term showed significant interaction for mortality both at discharge and 90 days ( P <0.01). Conclusion EVT in large core AIS populations may disparately reduce mortality in women compared to men.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".