Use of Artificial Intelligence Including Multimodal Systems to Improve the Management of Cardiovascular Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rising prevalence of cardiovascular disease presents an escalating challenge for current health services, which are grappling with increasing demands. Innovative changes are imperative to sustain the delivery of high-quality patient care. Recent technologic advances have resulted in the emergence of artificial intelligence as a viable solution. Advanced algorithms are now capable of performing complex analysis of large volumes of data rapidly and with exceptional accuracy. Multimodality artificial intelligence systems handle a diverse range of data including images, text, video, and audio. Compared with single-modality systems, multimodal artificial intelligence systems appear to hold promise for enhancing overall performance and enabling smoother integration into existing workflows. Such systems can empower physicians with clinical decision support and enhanced efficiency. Owing to the complexity of the field, however, truly multimodal artificial intelligence is still scarce in the management of cardiovascular disease. This article aims to cover current research, emerging trends, and the future utilisation of artificial intelligence in the management of cardiovascular disease, with a focus on multimodality systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".