MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400849251 · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2024.07.021

Increased Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability and Cognitive Impairment in Patients With ESKD

2024· article· en· W4400849251 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mickaël Bobot, Éric Guedj, Noémie Resseguier, Julien Faraut, Philippe Garrigue, Vincent Nail, Guillaume Hache, Sandra Gonzalez, Nathalie McKay, Romain Vial, Dammar Bouchouareb, Guillaume Lano, Noémie Jourde‐Chiche, Ariane Duval-Sabatier, Fabrice Guilaume, Benjamin Guillet, Stéphane Burtey

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney International Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBarrier Structure and Function Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineKidney diseaseMontreal Cognitive AssessmentInternal medicineNeurocognitiveTrail Making TestBlood–brain barrierRenal functionDementiaGastroenterologyEndocrinologyCognitive impairmentDiseaseCognitionCentral nervous systemPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairment. This cognitive impairment is associated with an increased permeability of blood-brain barrier (BBB) in rodents with CKD, linked to activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) by indoxyl sulphate (IS). The objective of the BREIN study was to confirm the increased BBB permeability in humans with CKD. Method The BREIN comparative study (NCT04328415) prospectively included patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and controls healthy volunteers matched in age, sex, and level of education to a patient. In all participants, BBB permeability was quantified by brain 99m Tc-DTPA SPECT/CT as a percentage of injected activity (% IA). A battery of neurocognitive tests was performed, and serum uremic toxins accumulation and AhR activation were assessed. Results Fifteen patients with ESKD and 14 healthy volunteers were analyzed. Patients with ESKD had higher BBB permeability compared to controls: 0.29 ± 0.07 versus 0.14 ± 0.06 %IA, P = 0.002. Patients with ESKD displayed lower Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCA) score: 22.0 ± 5.0 versus 27.3 ± 2.8, P = 0.008; impaired short-term memory (doors test): 12.5 ± 3.4 versus 16.5 ± 3.4, P = 0.005; higher Beck depression score 8.1 ± 9.1 versus 2.7 ± 3.4, P = 0.046; and slightly more daily cognitive complaints: 42.5 ± 29.3 versus 29.8 ± 14.0 P = 0.060. Patients with ESKD displayed higher IS levels (86.1 ± 48.4 vs. 3.2 ± 1.7 μmol/l, P = 0.001) and AhR activating potential (37.7 ± 17.8% vs. 24.7 ± 10.4%, P = 0.027). BBB permeability was inversely correlated with MoCA score ( r = −0.60, 95% confidence interval [−0.772 to −0.339], P = 0.001) in the overall population. Conclusion Patients with ESKD display an increased BBB permeability compared to matched healthy volunteers. Association with uremic toxins and cognitive impairment needs to be assessed in larger cohorts of patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney International ReportsSame topicBarrier Structure and Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207