Assessing the impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on anxiety & depression symptom scores in adults with Cystic Fibrosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mental health effects of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) on adults with CF are still uncertain with mixed findings from published studies. To systematically investigate the impact of ETI on symptoms of anxiety and depression in adults with CF, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores were evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months post-ETI. Overall, GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores improved at 6 months post-ETI, with a greater proportion of individuals experiencing a clinically significant improvement (vs. worsening) of their symptoms, which was sustained at 12 months. Factors influencing mental health outcomes included pre-existing psychiatric diagnoses and psychiatric medication use. In conclusion, although there was overall improvement in anxiety and depression symptoms post-ETI, approximately 10 % of individuals experienced clinically significant worsening.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".