First documented occurrences of Cladonia krogiana and C. rangiformis in North America
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Funding Information: We thank Scott LaGreca for providing a photograph of the specimen of C. rangiformis at BM that was reportedly collected on Bermuda; Bruce Allen and the late Ronald Pursell for allowing us to cite their collections of Homalothecium sericeum from Newfoundland; Zdeněk Palice for enabling us to compare his collection of C. krogiana from the Czech Republic with material from Canada and Norway; Nathalie Djan-Chékar (Provincial Museum of Newfoundland and Labrador) for co-organizing the 2007 Tuckerman Workshop; and Irwin Brodo, James Lendemer, and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments on the manuscript. Permission to collect lichens in Fundy National Park and New River Beach Provincial Park (NRBPP) was approved by Renee Wissink (Parks Canada) and Martin MacMullin (NB Department of Tourism, Heritage, and Culture). Fieldwork in NRBPP and follow-up studies were supported in part by the New Brunswick Wildlife Trust Fund and the New Brunswick Environmental Trust Fund. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, New York Botanical Garden. All rights reserved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it