MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400858292 · doi:10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101288

Evaluating the sustainability of groundwater abstraction in small watersheds using time series analysis

2024· article· en· W4400858292 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGroundwater for Sustainable Development · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwaterSustainabilityAbstractionEnvironmental scienceSeries (stratigraphy)Hydrology (agriculture)Time seriesWater resource managementComputer scienceGeologyGeotechnical engineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Groundwater is crucial in meeting the water needs of communities, industries, and ecosystems. The effective management of this resource is essential for maintaining the long-term stability of both the environmental and socio-economic conditions. This work focuses on assessing the sustainability of groundwater abstraction in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, specifically from well fields situated within the small-scale watersheds of Winter River and North River. The advanced time series analysis techniques, including Vector Error Correction Models (VECM), Impulse Response Functions (IRFs), and Forecast Error Variance Decomposition (FEVD) are employed to investigate the relationships among precipitation, temperature, groundwater abstraction, and stream flows. The analysis of IRFs reveals dynamic responses of streams to various shocks, including the variation of temperature, precipitation and well discharges, which showcase related immediate impacts, short-term responses, and long-term relationships. Temperature fluctuations exhibit complex responses, with short-term response decreases followed by sustained increases. Precipitation emerges as a dominant factor, showing sustained positive impacts on streamflow. Well operations significantly influence stream ecosystems, emphasizing the importance of optimized well operation strategies. The FEVD revealed that the first forecast horizon for all stream flows is primarily influenced by past shocks in precipitation with 16–55% in addition to other factors. The walk forward cross-validated forecast values for the next 24 months align with seasonal trends, reflecting declining discharge in summer, variable but generally decreasing discharge in fall, and increased discharge in winter and spring. The study findings provide recommendations for sustainable groundwater abstraction practices, including optimizing well operation strategies, community and stakeholder engagement, and ecosystem preservation. • Time Series Analysis effectively evaluates groundwater sustainability in small-scale watersheds. • Impulse Response Functions (IRFs) highlighted hydrological connections in the watersheds. • Forecast Error Variance Decomposition revealed influence of past-shocks in forecasts. • Performed rolling window walk-forward cross-validation for forecasts. • Key recommendations for sustainable groundwater abstraction practices are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score0.686

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it