Risk, potential threats and benefits of calculating a country's international investment position
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В данной статье рассмотрена международная инвестиционная позиция современного государства, на примере Канады. Рассмотрены факторы и причины роста международной инвестиционной позиции страны, выявлены и обоснованы ее преимущества и недостатки. Методологическим подходом разрабатываемой стратегии инвестиционной позиции страны является рассмотрение ряда факторов, от которых зависит уязвимость финансовой системы к значительному увеличению неуверенности и нерасположенности к риску. В статье сформулирована окончательная концепция позиционирования. The gist of this article boils down to the international investment position of a modern state, using the example of Canada. The factors and reasons for the growth of the country's international investment position are considered; its advantages and disadvantages are identified and substantiated. The methodological approach of the developed strategy of the country's investment position is to consider a number of factors that determine the vulnerability of the financial system to a significant increase in uncertainty and risk aversion. The article formulates the final concept of positioning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".