Characterization of a nosocomial outbreak caused by VIM-1 <i>Klebsiella michiganensis</i> using Fourier-Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a significant concern worldwide due to their impact on patient safety and healthcare costs. Klebsiella spp., particularly Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella oxytoca , are frequently implicated in HAIs and often exhibit multidrug resistance mechanisms, posing challenges for infection control. In this study, we evaluated Fourier-transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy as a rapid method for characterizing a nosocomial outbreak caused by VIM-1-producing K. oxytoca . A total of 47 isolates, including outbreak strains and controls, were collected from Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Spain and the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. FT-IR spectroscopy was employed for bacterial typing, offering rapid and accurate results compared to conventional methods like pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and correlating with whole-genome sequencing (WGS) results. The FT-IR spectra analysis revealed distinct clusters corresponding to outbreak strains, suggesting a common origin. Subsequent WGS analysis identified Klebsiella michiganensis as the causative agent of the outbreak, challenging the initial assumption based on FT-IR results. However, both FT-IR and WGS methods showed high concordance, with an Adjusted Rand index (AR) of 0.882 and an Adjusted Wallace coefficient (AW) of 0.937, indicating the reliability of FT-IR in outbreak characterization. Furthermore, FT-IR spectra visualization highlighted discriminatory features between outbreak and non-outbreak isolates, facilitating rapid screening in case and outbreak is suspected. In conclusion, FT-IR spectroscopy offers a rapid and cost-effective alternative to traditional typing methods, enabling timely intervention and effective management of nosocomial outbreaks. Its integration with WGS enhances the accuracy of outbreak investigations, demonstrating its utility in clinical microbiology and infection control practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".