Sleep-wake behavior and responses to sleep deprivation and immune challenge of protein kinase RNA-activated knockout mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protein Kinase RNA-activated (PKR) is an enzyme that plays a role in many systemic processes, including modulation of inflammation, and is implicated in neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). PKR phosphorylation results in the production of several cytokines involved in the regulation / modulation of sleep, including interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α and interferon-γ. We hypothesized targeting PKR would alter spontaneous sleep of mice, attenuate responses to sleep deprivation, and inhibit responses to immune challenge. To test these hypotheses, we determined the sleep-wake phenotype of mice lacking PKR (knockout; PKR-/-) during undisturbed baseline conditions; in responses to six hours of sleep deprivation; and after immune challenge with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Adult male mice (C57BL/6J, n = 7; PKR-/-, n = 7) were surgically instrumented with EEG recording electrodes and an intraperitoneal microchip to record core body temperature. During undisturbed baseline conditions, PKR -/- mice spent more time in non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMS) and rapid-eye movement sleep (REMS), and less time awake at the beginning of the dark period of the light:dark cycle. Delta power during NREMS, a measure of sleep depth, was less in PKR-/- mice during the dark period, and core body temperatures were lower during the light period. Both mouse strains responded to sleep deprivation with increased NREMS and REMS, although these changes did not differ substantively between strains. The initial increase in delta power during NREMS after sleep deprivation was greater in PKR-/- mice, suggesting a faster buildup of sleep pressure with prolonged waking. Immune challenge with LPS increased NREMS and inhibited REMS to the same extent in both mouse strains, whereas the initial LPS-induced suppression of delta power during NREMS was greater in PKR-/- mice. Because sleep regulatory and immune responsive systems in brain are redundant and overlapping, other mediators and signaling pathways in addition to PKR are involved in the responses to acute sleep deprivation and LPS immune challenge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".