MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400869389 · doi:10.1080/14786419.2024.2378201

Insights from degradation studies of alpha mangostin from <i>Garcinia mangostana</i> : key findings

2024· article· en· W4400869389 on OpenAlexaff
Pratixha M. Palkar, Shital B. Palghadmal, S.S. Mane, Priti Darne, Shankar Vidhate, Nisha Mehta, Sriram Padmanabhan

Bibliographic record

VenueNatural Product Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNatural Compound Pharmacology Studies
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGarcinia mangostanaKey (lock)Traditional medicineDegradation (telecommunications)ChemistryComputer scienceMedicineComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study emphasises the necessity of substantiating the stability of plant-derived bioactive compounds for their therapeutic effectiveness in pharmaceutical production. The limelight is on alpha-mangostin (AM), a xanthone from Garcinia mangostana L., renowned for its diverse biological properties. Acid exposure during a forced degradation study on AM resulted in degraded alpha-mangostin (DAM) formation, with structural modifications of the two prenyl groups at C2 and C8 positions as determined by NMR and HRMS analysis. Other conditions (temperature, humidity, photolytic, oxidative, and alkaline) showed a minimal impact on AM. DAM, although showed antibacterial activity at concentration higher than AM (MIC values for AM: 0.39–1.56 µg/mL; DAM: >25 µg/mL), it exhibited potential for binding with Glucosyltransferase-SI from Streptococcus mutans and human Acetylcholinesterase in molecular docking simulations, comparable to AM. This suggests, the importance of prenyl group at C2 and C8 positions for AM’s potent antibacterial activity and the decreased activity of DAM is due to lack of the prenyl groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNatural Product ResearchSame topicNatural Compound Pharmacology StudiesFrench-language works237,207