Woodhouse-Sakati syndrome: genotype–phenotype review and case of intra-familial heterogeneity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Woodhouse-Sakati syndrome (WSS) is a rare eponymous disease described by Drs. Woodhouse and Sakati in 1983 as a syndrome of hypogonadism, alopecia, diabetes mellitus, intellectual disability, and ECG abnormalities. A couple of years later, a variant in the gene DCAF17 (DDB1 and CUL4-associated factor 17) was labeled as the founder mutation in most cases of WSS in the Arabian Peninsula and the Middle East. Reports around the world started to emerge on variable presentations of the syndrome, expanding its phenotypic spectrum. In addition, the discovery of new variants in the same gene grew our understanding of this multi-systemic syndrome. Genotype and phenotype expansion is increasing with the growing number of diagnosed cases owing to the availability and advances in clinical genetic testing. This review describes the current understanding of the DCAF17 gene with its molecular implication in WSS. We also provide an extensive analysis of the documented genetic changes associated with the syndrome, describing the geographical prevalence of these genetic variations. Additionally, we examine the disorder’s extensive manifestations and clinical presentations and describe a case of intra-familial phenotypic heterogeneity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".