MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400873185 · doi:10.35767/gscpgbull.71.2.63

Depositional, stratigraphic and structural controls on the geometry of Montney Formation reservoirs: Lower Triassic, northeast British Columbia, northwest Alberta

2024· article· en· W4400873185 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
I. Peter Proverbs, Kerrie L. Bann, Brian Taylor, J.A. Nasen, C.J. Frostad

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Canadian Energy Geoscience · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSedimentary depositional environmentGeologyPaleontologyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Lower Triassic Montney Formation is a world-class unconventional hydrocarbon reservoir that spans the border of northeast British Columbia and northwest Alberta. Integrated sedimentological and ichnological analyses suggest that the Montney Formation was deposited in a predominantly prodeltaic setting that was commonly influenced by both river flood and storm processes. Riverine processes include the local occurrence of normally- and inversely-graded siltstone and sandstone interbeds, interpreted as the record of sediment-laden hyperpycnal flows. Episodic storms are recorded by the local occurrence of hummocky cross-stratified interbeds, as well as normally graded, parallel and wave-ripple laminated beds, which are commonly draped by structureless carbonaceous mudstones. These mudstone drapes represent river-flood-derived fluid muds that collapsed from hypopycnal plumes following the passage of the storms and suggest the intimate linkage between storms and heightened fluvial discharge. The basin in which the Montney Formation was deposited began as three sub-basins, northern, central and southern, each of which experienced different patterns of subsidence and uplift that varied both spatially and temporally during sedimentation. Subsidence of the northern sub-basin was compartmentalized by deep seated faults that provided accommodation for the basal sequence of the Montney Formation, Sequence 1. Subsequent fault movement resulted in reduced accommodation in the northern sub-basin and accelerated subsidence in the central sub-basin, providing accommodation for deposition of Sequence 2, the basal sequence in the central sub-basin. The northern sub-basin remained paleotopographically elevated throughout deposition of Sequence 2 and early Sequence 3 successions, and these younger units did not extend beyond the northern limit of the central sub-basin. During subsequent deposition of the late Sequences 3 and Sequence 4 successions, compartmentalization between the north and central sub-basin was greatly reduced and these intervals were deposited relatively more uniformly along-strike. The unconventional and conventional reservoirs in both the northern and central sub-basins occur at the scale of systems tracts within the four depositional sequences of the Montney Formation. Reconstructing the depositional history of the component systems tracts of Sequence 1 through early Sequence 3 reveals the dynamic interplay between syndepositional tectonism, fluctuating relative sea-level and deltaic depositional processes in controlling the character, geometry and distribution of prolific Montney Formation reservoirs. The recognition of these key geological controls enhances predictability in this valuable resource and may be applicable to other fine-grained reservoirs elsewhere. Résumé Considéré comme un réservoir d’hydrocarbures non conventionnel de classe mondiale, la Formation de Montney du Trias inférieur s’étend de la bordure du Nord-Est de la Colombie-Britannique et du Nord-Ouest de l’Alberta. Les analyses sédimentaires et ichnologiques intégrées nous donnent à penser que la Formation de Montney s’est formée dans un contexte prodeltaïque prédominant influencé par les débordements de rivières et les tempêtes. Les processus fluviaux incluent l’occurrence locale d’interstratification de siltstone et de grès classés normalement et inversement, ce que l’on interprète comme des indices de courants hyperpycnaux à haute densité de sédiments. Des tempêtes épisodiques sont révélées par la présence locale d’interlits bosselés interstratifiés, en plus de lits feuilletés à motifs de rives de plages classés normalement et parallèlement, lesquels sont généralement nappés de mudstone carboné amorphe. Indiquant un lien étroit entre les tempêtes et les décharges fluviales élevées, ces nappes de mudstone représentent des fluides boueux d’eau de rivière en crue qui se sont effondrés d’un panache hypopycnal suivant le passage de tempêtes. Le bassin dans lequel la Formation de Montney s’est formée consistait au début en trois sous-bassins, soit ceux du nord, du centre et du sud, chacun d’eux ayant subi, sur les plans de l’espace et du temps, durant la sédimentation, différentes formes de subsidence et de soulèvement. La subsidence du sous-bassin nord était cloisonnée par de profondes failles fournissant l’espace disponible pour la séquence basale de la Formation de Montney, la Séquence 1. Les mouvements de failles ultérieurs ont réduit l’espace disponible du sous-bassin nord et accéléré la subsidence du sous-bassin central fournissant ainsi un espace disponible pour le dépôt de la Séquence 2, la séquence basale du sous-bassin central. Sur le plan paléotopographique, le sous-bassin nord est resté élevé durant tous les dépôts successifs de la Séquence 2 et de la Séquence 3 précoce, et ces unités plus jeunes ne se sont pas prolongées au-delà de la limite nord du sous-bassin central. Durant les dépôts successifs ultérieurs des Séquences 3 et 4, le cloisonnement entre les sous-bassins nord et central s’est vu réduit considérablement et ces intervalles ont été déposés de manière relativement plus uniforme, parallèlement à la direction. Les réservoirs conventionnels et non conventionnels dans les sous-bassins nord et central se manifestent à l’échelle des cortèges sédimentaires, à même les quatre séquences de dépôts de la Formation de Montney. La reconstruction de l’évolution sédimentaire des cortèges sédimentaires de la Séquence 1 à la Séquence 3 précoce révèle le dynamisme de l’action réciproque entre le tectonisme synsédimentaire, la fluctuation du niveau marin relatif et le processus sédimentaire deltaïque qui régissent le caractère, la géométrie et la répartition des réservoirs prolifiques de la Formation de Montney. La reconnaissance de ces mécanismes clés qui régissent la géologie permet de rehausser la prévisabilité de cette ressource de valeur et peut s’appliquer à d’autres gisements à grains fins ailleurs. Michel Ory

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Canadian Energy GeoscienceSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207