MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400877758 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-60709-7_1

Tourism Trends: Current Challenges for Tourism Destinations Management

2024· book-chapter· en· W4400877758 on OpenAlexaff
Frédéric Dimanche, Lidia Andrades

Bibliographic record

VenueTourism, hospitality & event management · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismBusinessTourist destinationsDestinationsCurrent (fluid)Hospitality management studiesMarketingRegional scienceGeographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This introductory chapter presents and discusses some of the salient challenges and trends (i.e., climate change, overtourism, threats to diversity, security, technology, labour issues, and competitiveness) that the tourism sector is facing and that must be addressed by any government and manager who has the ambition to lead a responsible, sustainable, and competitive destination. The chapter proposes to consider tourism from a different and more holistic perspective: Tourism should not be viewed only as an economic engine that sells services, but as an activity that is part of a global natural and socio-cultural system which is impacted by tourism (both positively and negatively) and that should also contribute to improvement and sustainability. It discusses how smart destinations require innovative development, management, and marketing solutions to address those challenges and trends to meet sustainable development goals (SDGs). Finally, the chapter introduces and proposes the model of the Spanish Secretariat of State for Tourism, developed by SEGITTUR, for the Smart Tourism Management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTourism, hospitality & event managementSame topicDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchFrench-language works237,207