Phase-Shift and Transmit Power Optimization for RIS-Aided Massive MIMO SWIPT IoT Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-assisted simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) Internet of Things (IoT) networks, where energy-limited IoT devices are overlaid with cellular information users (IUs). IoT devices are wirelessly powered by a RIS-assisted massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) base station (BS), which is simultaneously serving a group of IUs. By leveraging a two-timescale transmission scheme, precoding at the BS is developed based on the instantaneous channel state information (CSI), while the passive beamforming at the RIS is adapted to the slowly-changing statistical CSI. We derive closed-form expressions for the achievable spectral efficiency of the IUs and average harvested energy at the IoT devices, taking the channel estimation errors and pilot contamination into account. Then, a non-convex max-min fairness optimization problem is formulated subject to the power budget at the BS and individual quality of service requirements of IUs, where the transmit power levels at the BS and passive RIS reflection coefficients are jointly optimized. Our simulation results show that the average harvested energy at the IoT devices can be improved by 132% with the proposed resource allocation algorithm. Interestingly, IoT devices benefit from the pilot contamination, leading to a potential doubling of the harvested energy in certain network configurations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".