Ultimate in-plane shear capacity of 3-panel frameless cold-form steel corrugated walls under axial compression
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• 3-panel Frameless CFSCW works as both axial and lateral load-resisting system in low rise long span Frameless buildings. • The failure modes of the 3-panel Frameless CFSCW consist of buckling of the wall panels, distortion of footing channel, and connection damage. • The proposed finite element model can be used to simulate the force-displacement curve before buckling and display damage patterns of Frameless CFSCW effectively. • The ultimate shear capacity of 3-panel Frameless CFSCW is linearly correlated to the gauge thickness of the panel. The proposed equation shows an excellent match between the calculated results and the experiment results. The Frameless building system, developed by BEHLEN Industries LP, is a structural system that incorporates Cold Form Steel Corrugated Wall (CFSCW) components. These include walls, ceilings, and roofs formed by Frameless panels, along with footings, boundary columns, and an optional convex truss. The system employs simple bolt connections, enabling rapid construction without the need for heavy machinery. It is particularly cost-effective and is often utilized in regions with low seismic activity. In high seismic zones, the structural performance of The Frameless building system under combined compression and lateral loads has not been systematically examined. In this study, four full-scale 3-panel Frameless CFSCWs, were tested under combined axial and shear loads. A generic finite element model was proposed to simulate the force-deformation responses and deformed shapes of the 3-panel Frameless CFSCWs. The numerical simulation results were verified using the experimental results. The verified numerical model was then used in parameter study to examine the ultimate shear capacity of 3-panel Frameless CFSCW of different wall thickness, with the presence of axial compression. The results of the study revealed the ultimate shear capacity of 3-panel Frameless CFSCW is linearly correlated with gauge thickness of the wall panel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it