The Cooperative Maximal Covering Location Problem with ordered partial attractions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Maximal Covering Location Problem (MCLP) is a classical location problem where a company maximizes the demand covered by placing a given number of facilities, and each demand node is covered if the closest facility is within a predetermined radius. In the cooperative version of the problem (CMCLP), it is assumed that the facilities of the decision maker act cooperatively to increase the customers’ attraction towards the company. In this sense, a demand node is covered if the aggregated partial attractions (or partial coverings) of open facilities exceed a threshold. In this work, we generalize the CMCLP introducing an Ordered Median function (OMf), a function that assigns importance weights to the sorted partial attractions of each customer and then aggregates the weighted attractions to provide the total level of attraction. We name this problem the Ordered Cooperative Maximum Covering Location Problem (OCMCLP). The OMf serves as a means to compute the total attraction of each customer to the company as an aggregation of ordered partial attractions and constitutes a unifying framework for CMCLP models. We introduce a multiperiod stochastic non-linear formulation for the CMCLP with an embedded assignment problem characterizing the ordered cooperative covering. For this model, two exact solution approaches are presented: a MILP reformulation with valid inequalities and an effective approach based on Generalized Benders’ cuts. Extensive computational experiments are provided to test our results with randomly generated data and the problem is illustrated with a case study of locating charging stations for electric vehicles in the city of Trois-Rivières, Québec (Canada).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".