MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Intertwined charge and spin density waves in a topological kagome material

2024· article· en· W4400884110 on OpenAlexafffund
Y. Chen, Jonathan Gaudet, Guy Marcus, Takuya Nomoto, Taishi Chen, Takahiro Tomita, M. Ikhlas, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Yang Zhao, Wangchun Chen, J. Strempfer, Ryotaro Arita, Satoru Nakatsuji, C. Broholm

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersEnergy Frontier Research CentersOak Ridge National LaboratoryArgonne National LaboratoryBasic Energy SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJapan Science and Technology CorporationGordon and Betty Moore FoundationU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAntiferromagnetismCharge (physics)Order (exchange)CrystallographyCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using neutrons and x rays we show the topological kagome antiferromagnet Mn 3 Sn for T < 285 K forms a homogeneous spin and charge ordered state comprising a longitudinally polarized spin density wave with wave vector k β = k β c ̂ , a helical modulated version of the room temperature antichiral magnetic order with k χ = k χ c ̂ , and charge density waves with wave vectors 2 k β , 2 k χ , and k β + k χ . Though k χ and k β coincide for 200 K < T < 230 K , they exhibit distinct continuous T dependencies before locking to commensurate values of k β = 1 12 c * and k χ = 5 48 c * at low T . Density functional theory indicates this complex modulated state may be associated with the nesting of Fermi surfaces from correlated flat kagome bands, which host Weyl nodes that are annihilated as it forms. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ResearchSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207